Rabbis Decide Some Israelis Cannot Marry
Subsequent Letter to the Editor:
Marriage Laws Protect Israel's Jewish Identity
Am going to bed now.
Subsequent Letter to the Editor:
Marriage Laws Protect Israel's Jewish Identity
My brother Dan would shake his head in dismay to see me reading, let alone quoting or referring others to the New York Times. But I was intrigued today by a passage I came across in Hannah Arendt's "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil".
Arendt's book on Adolf Eichmann's trial was one of first books that I began to read and then set aside as I became too impatient to finish before moving on to something else. Since that time, about three years ago, this tendency has grown endemic in my life. I am currently reading about nine books, give or take three or four. The problem with this unfortunate trend is that not only do I complete but a scant few of the books I begin, but I retain very little of the contents even of the ones I do finish.
"Eichmann in Jerusalem" isn't my book - it was lent to me long ago, and it is past time to return it. Somehow I feel that I need to go back and finish those books which I dropped before moving on to new ones. I feel it is unfair to the books, their authors, and myself to leave them with pages earmarked, notes in the margins, but only half read. Plus - I'm tired of saying: "I started that book, but never finished it . . ." So today I picked up Arendt's documentary - and started it over. The passage that led me to the article linked above follows:
Arendt's book on Adolf Eichmann's trial was one of first books that I began to read and then set aside as I became too impatient to finish before moving on to something else. Since that time, about three years ago, this tendency has grown endemic in my life. I am currently reading about nine books, give or take three or four. The problem with this unfortunate trend is that not only do I complete but a scant few of the books I begin, but I retain very little of the contents even of the ones I do finish.
"Eichmann in Jerusalem" isn't my book - it was lent to me long ago, and it is past time to return it. Somehow I feel that I need to go back and finish those books which I dropped before moving on to new ones. I feel it is unfair to the books, their authors, and myself to leave them with pages earmarked, notes in the margins, but only half read. Plus - I'm tired of saying: "I started that book, but never finished it . . ." So today I picked up Arendt's documentary - and started it over. The passage that led me to the article linked above follows:
. . . Hence the strange boast: "We make no ethnic distinctions [concerning the charges brought against Eichmann]," which sounded less strange in Israel, where rabbinical law rules the personal status of Jewish citizens, with the result that no Jew can marry a non-Jew; marriages concluded abroad are recognized, but the children of mixed marriages are legally bastards (children of Jewish parentage born out of wedlock are legitimate), and if one happens to have a non-Jewish mother he can be neither married nor buried. The outrage in this state of affairs has become more acute since 1953, when a sizable portion of jurisdiction in matters of family law was handed over to the secular courts. Women can now inherit property and in general enjoy equal status with men. Hence it is hardly respect for the faith of the power of the fanatically religious minority that prevents the government of Israel from substituting secular jurisdiction for rabbinical law in matters of marriage and divorce. Israeli citizens, religious and nonreligious, seems agreed upon the desirability of having a law in which prohibits intermarriage, and it is chiefly for this reason - as Israeli officials outside the courtroom were willing to admit - that they are also agreed upon the undesirability of a written constitution in which such a law would embarrassingly have to be spelled out . . . Whatever the reasons, there certainly was something breathtaking in the naiveté with which the prosecution denounced the infamous Nuremburg Laws of 1935, which had prohibited intermarriage and sexual intercourse between Jews and Germans. The better informed among the correspondents were well aware of the irony, but they did not mention it in their reports.
Am going to bed now.